What Would Kiva Do (WWKD)?

So what happens when you harness Gen X and Y’s idealistic and highly entrepreneurial nature, love of technology, and hunger for feedback and use it to bring resources to people in need? Quite simply, you get the hottest nonprofit on the planet.

Kiva connects individual lenders to developing-world entrepreneurs and in the process gives people access to capital rather than a handout. Their donors are closely connected to their mission because they are helping one individual lift themselves out of poverty. 90% of their lenders recirculate their loans, once they are paid back so the amount of funds available keeps growing and growing. Kiva is so popular that after a recent string of great publicity about the organization, they ran out of funding opportunities and stopped taking donations for a short period of time. They also have to consistantly limit how much each individual can lend so that more people have a chance to participate. How often do you hear about nonprofits capping donations?

At the same time that Kiva has been growing beyond anyone but its founders wildest expectations, there has been a lot of concern in the social sector that there is this insurmountable leadership gap that threatens to ruin the entire nonprofit sector that the idealistic baby boomers so carefully created. Who will be the next nonprofit executive director that works 80-hour weeks and spends 75 of those 80 hours looking for funding to keep the organization afloat? Who will step up to be the Chief Operating Officer that lays off half of the staff when the government grant dries up? Who will be the next Development Director to send the annual appeal letter to 1,000 people who might be interested in supporting your organization because they once supported the World Wildlife Fund? Anyone? Anyone?

I don’t think the issue is “are there enough young people to take over the reins at nonprofits?” There are enough young people that care about the problems and great opportunities in our communities but they are off starting organizations like Kiva, First Step Initiative, and Donors Choose, instead of paying their dues at the Anytown Community Development Center or the National Association for People that Care about the Environment.

The new question is “what are established nonprofits going to do to make themselves more attractive to this demographic?” Remember when Silicon Valley start-ups were tripping over themselves to have the most relaxed and fun office environment so that they could recruit scarce talent? “We have a foosball table in our conference room! Well we let all of our employees bring their dog to work and we will bring in a specially trained dog masseuse in every Friday to keep our staff happy.” I’m not suggesting the nonprofit sector go that far (massages for staff isn’t such a bad idea though), but it is time for the nonprofit sector to start thinking about what it will take to recruit and retain Gen X and Y. Title and salary are not enough to motivate these generations. It is more about how flexible the office environment is, what new skills sets can someone learn in your organization, and what is the impact on the community. Once the nonprofit sector figures that out, maybe we’ll all have to limit how much an individual can donate to us.

Ready to Lead

There is a great new study from the Myers Foundation about the next generation of leadership for nonprofit organizations. From the report:

A skilled, committed, and diverse pool of next generation leaders would like to be nonprofit executive directors in the future, according to a new national survey of nearly 6,000 next generation leaders. However, the survey also finds that there are significant barriers: work-life balance, insufficient life-long earning potential, lack of mentorship and overwhelming fundraising responsibilities which may prevent many younger nonprofit staff from becoming executives. The survey, Ready to Lead? Next Generation Leaders Speak Out, is the largest national survey to date of emerging nonprofit leaders and was produced by the Meyer Foundation in partnership with CompassPoint Nonprofit Services, The Annie E. Casey Foundation and Idealist.org.

An interesting fact from the report is that less that one-third of nonprofit executive director hires happen from within an organization, compared to 65% in the for-profit sector. Without a clear path to move up in nonprofit and philanthropic organizations, will the sector lose its most promising new talent?

How to know when you have overlinked on LinkedIn


I consider myself a good networker. I get cards at conferences, forward my contacts relevant job opportunities, and try to find opportunities to bring people from various facets of my life together (my new favorite way to do that is couple date nights). I don't spam my contacts and I try to make myself available when people in my network need me (my blog readers are at the top of that list).

So why am I having a crisis of confidence of my networking skills? The answer is the beast that is LinkedIn. You link with other people in the network to create an online professional network. At first it seemed to be endless friend collecting for no real purpose but I have started seeing people like Lucy Bernholz use the Q and A feature in really creative ways. I started getting all giddy with excitement thinking about all of the ways I could harness the wisdom of crowds for social good. Maybe my network has the answers on how to solve poverty, maybe they know about a great up and coming prison re-entry program that foundations could bring to scale, and maybe they know when Bill Strickland will be in Minneapolis so I can pick his brain about new solutions to old social problems. The options were endless, so I decided to be more proactive about who I added to my network. I looked for fellow PPIA alums because they are spread out through a variety of sectors but have a common committment to using policy for social good, ABFE members because they may have ideas of how to uplift black communities through philanthropy that I can apply in Minnesota, and EPIP members because fresh perspectives are always useful and then I will always have someone fun to have dinner with when I am in a new town for a business trip.

My network grew and grew with people who want to make the world a better place until I had 113 connections and a network of 467,000 professionals.

Then there was Bill Gates. I saw that Bill posted a Q & A on LinkedIn, which means he's a member. I decided to add him to my network, not so I could say "by the way, Bill Gates is in my network". No, I had much more altruistic reasons. If Bill Gates was in my network, he would know what fabulous ideas I have for improving society and would give me half of his foundations assets (even in my wildest fantasies, I don't even ask for all of the assets) to make the world a better place. So I wasn't asking Bill Gates to join my LinkedIn Network to help myself, I was asking him to join my network so I could be a conduit for him to make the change that he wants to see in the world. So here's how our little exchange went:

Hi Bill,
I want you to join my network on LinkedIn.
-Trista

and here is the response that I got from Bill Gates senior (who must manage his son's LinkedIn account) a few minutes later:

Please don't.
-Bill

Here is what I have gotten from this experience.

  1. I was one degree away from Bill Gates, which means that his spam filter is way off.
  2. I feel a little terrible taking time away from Bill Gates Sr.'s day, when he could have been curing malaria and fixing our ailing education system. He had to spend that time telling me to buzz off.
  3. I may have overreached but you never know until you try. I'll take a few buzz off and "nice try, small fry" to get to my ultimate goal, which is to build a strong network of people who will make positive change in this world.

So if you are interested in joining my Bill Gates-free LinkedIn network (maybe it's better that he isn't there, he might just spam us with ads for Vista) then click here.